Currently, we are litigating against hernia mesh manufacturers for injuries caused by defective designed hernia mesh devices. While hernia meshes have generally been around for almost 50 years, the devices currently in litigation each have unique features that allegedly make them defective and dangerous. The devices at issue are primarily manufactured by C.R. Bard, Ethicon and Atrium.
C.R. Bard controls about 60% of the hernia mesh market in the United States and across the world;
Bard’s meshes are claimed to be defective through their use of heavy weight small pored polypropelene; the use of polypropelenes that were not medical grade and not suitable for human implantation; the addition of a ePTFE layer that is alleged to contract at a different rate from the polypropylene causing the buckling and balling of the device; the use of a Sepra coating that prevents healthy ingrowth and fosters adhesions.
The FDA has approved several Bard hernia mesh devices for use in hernia repair surgical procedures through the FDA 510(k) process. The 510k process does not require a manufacturer to prove that a product is safe for its intended use, but merely requires a showing that a device is a “substantive equivalent” to a product or products already approved by the FDA. In fact, post-approval, the FDA has advised consumers that adverse events as a result of hernia mesh devices are possible. According to the FDA, “[t]he most common adverse events following hernia repair with mesh are pain, infection, hernia recurrence, adhesion, and bowel obstruction. Some other potential adverse events that can occur following hernia repair with mesh are mesh migration and mesh shrinkage (contraction).”
Ethicon’s Physiomesh was removed from the market in 2016 due to its alleged defective design utilizing multiple layers of PDS which is the result in failure to allow proper incorporation into the body, adhere to important organ structures causing injury, and otherwise fail to perform as intended. Importantly, even when the Physiomesh device properly incorporates into the body, the design of the polypropelene is alleged to have insufficient burst strength causing fracturing of the mesh and recurrence of hernias.
Sales of Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Mesh began in March 2010, after the FDA approved its use through a 510(k) process. Ethicon’s Physiomesh Flexible Composite Mesh is used in laparoscopic repair of abdominal (ventral) hernias. On May 25, 2016, the Ethicon Corporation issued an urgent field safety notice to withdraw its Physiomesh Flexible Composite Mesh from hospitals because of high failure rates and complications such as adhesions, fistulas and infections that resulted in pain and additional surgery.
Atrium’s C-Qur Mesh devices are claimed to be defective due to their heavy weight small pore meshes being coated with fish oil. The presence of fish oil is alleged to prevent integration into the body causing adhesions and damage to important and is alleged to alter the body chemistry of the patient allowing for increased infections.
Many physicians have reported to the FDA various problems with the C-Qur mesh. There were so many reported complications that on October 11, 2012, the FDA issued a warning letter to Atrium Medical Corporation, noting that the company was failing to adequately address complaints related to infections associated with the C-Qur hernia mesh.
The letter also revealed that Atrium Corporation appeared to be ignoring numerous sterility complaints, including at least 35 separate complaints of human hair found in medical devices that were supposed to be sterile.
The FDA’s letter also said Atrium added additional products to their sterilization load, including the C-Qur V-Patch, without properly evaluating the additional challenges that this device may present to sterilization. Additionally, Atrium modified the temperature during the manufacturing process of the C-Qur hernia mesh without approval of the FDA.
Despite the FDA’s warning letters, requests for compliance and mounting medical studies that questioned the safety of C-Qur mesh, Atrium continued to market its C-Qur composite mesh products.
On February 3, 2015, at the FDA’s request, the US Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against Atrium for introducing adulterated and misbranded medical devices into the marketplace. Ultimately Atrium was fined $6 million for noncompliance. The FDA also issued a permanent injunction.
This stopped the manufacture and distribution of C-Qur hernia mesh. Production cannot resume until the FDA finds the manufacturing, processing, packing, holding and distribution of Atrium’s devices are in compliance. Despite this, C-Qur mesh continues to be used in surgeries nationwide.
The side effects from C-Qur composite mesh can be painful and difficult to treat and include:
Foley and Small is accepting Hernia Mesh Implant cases. If you, or a family member, or a close friend have suffered injuries as a result of a Hernia Mesh Implant, contact Foley and Small.
-Douglas D. Small
-Edmond W. Foley
If you, a friend or family member has suffered injury due to a defective medical implant email us from our Contact page. You can also call us at 800-276-2525.
Foley & Small has handled numerous defective medical implant cases helping our clients and their families deal with the effects of such defective products.
Represented woman struck by a vehicle involved in a high speed auto chase.
Represented high school student injured in highway intersection accident suffering vertebral fractures.
Represented elderly handicapped gentlemen who fell on asphalt debris in apartment complex parking lot.
Represented woman injured at county road intersection collision suffering complex hand injuries.
Lead counsel in Indiana working to secure a settlement of $125,000,000.00 against the New England Compounding Center and its officers, directors and employees arising from fungus contaminated epidural injections distributed throughout the United States, including Indiana and Michigan.
Represented worker injured at work site due to injuries caused by third party contractors (not employer).
Retail store slip and fall claim resulting in brain injury.
Represented estate of employee injured as a result of an at-work explosion caused by third party contractor.
Represented woman injured due to defective product resulting in injuries involving significant complications and multiple follow up procedures.
Represented estate of construction worker injured who suffered fatal injuries during the course of assisting and the unloading of construction materials from a trailer.
Represented estate of man electrocuted while working on farm property. Settlement with certain defendants and trial with one defendant.
Represented estate of middle age woman who suffered fatal injuries during the course of a car semi-tractor collision.
Represented estate of man who died from injuries due to collision with a semi-tractor trailer.
Represented family members suffering injury after being struck by a delivery vehicle which failed to stop for a stop sign.
Represented delivery driver of RV units injured in crash with vehicle on interstate highway resulting in severe lower extremity injuries. Settlements with two defendants and verdict against a third defendant.
Represented client rearended by truck resulting in concussive and hand injuries.
Represented client involved in an intersectional accident resulting in chest and upper extremity injuries.
Foley & Small handles and tries cases across Indiana and Michigan. This includes working in the following counties, county seats and cities: